Table 1 Parameters obtained from the analysis of the Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations for HoBi and DyBi, compared to the data reported for HoBi in Ref.33 and for DySb in Ref.26.
Compound | \(i=\) | \(\alpha\) | \({\beta }\) | \({\gamma }\) |
---|---|---|---|---|
HoBi (this work) | \(F_i\) (T) | 265 | 492 | 735 |
\(k_{F,i}\) (Å) | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.18 | |
\(n_i\) (cm\(^{-3}\)) | 2.44\(\times 10^{19}\) | 9.22\(\times 10^{19}\) | ||
\(m^*_i\) (\(m_e\)) | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.17 | |
HoBi (Ref.33, DFT calculations) | \(F_{i,calc}\) (T) | 243 | 489 | 835 |
\(m^*_{i,calc}\) (\(m_e\)) | 1.14 | 0.54 | 0.46 | |
HoBi (Ref.33, SdH oscillations) | \(F_i\) (T) | 280 | 513 | 747 |
\(m^*_i\) (\(m_e\)) | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.29 | |
DyBi (this work) | \(F_i\) (T) | 220 | 446 | 815 |
\(k_{F,i}\) (Å) | 0.08 | 0.012 | 0.21 | |
\(n_i\) (cm\(^{-3}\)) | 1.85\(\times 10^{19}\) | 9.74\(\times 10^{19}\) | ||
\(m^*_i\) (\(m_e\)) | 0.22 | 0.27 | - | |
DySb (Ref.26, DFT calculations) | \(F_{i,calc}\) (T) | 369 | 1022 | 1063 |
\(m^*_{i,calc}\) (\(m_e\)) | 0.21 | 0.42 | 0.49 | |
DySb (Ref.26, SdH oscillations) | \(F_i\) (T) | 369 | 745 | 1094 |
\(m^*_i\) (\(m_e\)) | 0.69 | 0.88 | – |