Table 1 Parameters obtained from the analysis of the Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations for HoBi and DyBi, compared to the data reported for HoBi in Ref.33 and for DySb in Ref.26.

From: Temperature-dependent Fermi surface probed by Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations in topological semimetal candidates DyBi and HoBi

Compound

\(i=\)

\(\alpha\)

\({\beta }\)

\({\gamma }\)

HoBi (this work)

\(F_i\) (T)

265

492

735

\(k_{F,i}\) (Å)

0.09

0.12

0.18

\(n_i\) (cm\(^{-3}\))

2.44\(\times 10^{19}\)

9.22\(\times 10^{19}\)

\(m^*_i\) (\(m_e\))

0.17

0.22

0.17

HoBi (Ref.33, DFT calculations)

\(F_{i,calc}\) (T)

243

489

835

\(m^*_{i,calc}\) (\(m_e\))

1.14

0.54

0.46

HoBi (Ref.33, SdH oscillations)

\(F_i\) (T)

280

513

747

\(m^*_i\) (\(m_e\))

0.27

0.29

0.29

DyBi (this work)

\(F_i\) (T)

220

446

815

\(k_{F,i}\) (Å)

0.08

0.012

0.21

\(n_i\) (cm\(^{-3}\))

1.85\(\times 10^{19}\)

9.74\(\times 10^{19}\)

\(m^*_i\) (\(m_e\))

0.22

0.27

-

DySb (Ref.26, DFT calculations)

\(F_{i,calc}\) (T)

369

1022

1063

\(m^*_{i,calc}\) (\(m_e\))

0.21

0.42

0.49

DySb (Ref.26, SdH oscillations)

\(F_i\) (T)

369

745

1094

\(m^*_i\) (\(m_e\))

0.69

0.88