Figure 1
From: Identification of EMT-associated prognostic features among grade II/III gliomas
Molecular subtyping and prognostic analysis in grade II/III gliomas based on NMF clustering. (A) Consensus matrix plot of NMF clustering. (B) Cophenetic distribution with rank = 2–10, where the cophenetic correlation is derived from the consistency matrix proposed by Brunet et al., reflects the stability of the clusters obtained by NMF. This value ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more stable clusters. (C) RSS distribution, rank = 2–10. RSS is the residual sum of the sum of squares and represents the clustering performance of the model, where the smaller the value is, the better the clustering effect of the model is. (D) Overall survival (OS) prognostic survival curve of molecular subtypes. (E) DFS prognostic survival curve of molecular subtypes.
