Table 5 Comparing of numerical results/REFs using QLM-FSVLFs technique for \(\gamma =1.7,\sigma =0.7\), \(m,\lambda =1\), \(A=2\), \(K=6\), \(\alpha =1,1.7\), and various \(r\in [0,1]\).
r | QLM-FSVLFs | PLSM21 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(h^{(6)}_{6,1}(r)\) | \({\mathbb {R}}_{6,1}^{(6)}(r)\) | \(h^{(6)}_{6,\frac{17}{10}}(r)\) | \({\mathbb {R}}_{6,\frac{17}{10}}^{(6)}(r)\) | \(\tilde{u}(r)\) | Error | |
0.0 | 1.18587014 | \(0.0000_{-0}\) | 1.186078708050383 | \(0.0000_{-0}\) | 1.18592781 | \(0.000_{-0}\) |
0.1 | 1.18480830 | \(3.6771_{-3}\) | 1.184762989665008 | \(3.5729_{-9}\) | 1.18482122 | \(1.438_{-3}\) |
0.2 | 1.18196899 | \(1.9265_{-3}\) | 1.181798785635447 | \(4.9691_{-9}\) | 1.18191175 | \(3.193_{-4}\) |
0.3 | 1.17772081 | \(5.5686_{-4}\) | 1.177537074846438 | \(4.1642_{-9}\) | 1.17761666 | \(4.895_{-4}\) |
0.4 | 1.17228067 | \(5.7501_{-6}\) | 1.172118584802979 | \(2.2938_{-9}\) | 1.17216020 | \(6.580_{-6}\) |
0.5 | 1.16576606 | \(6.1427_{-5}\) | 1.165624795848758 | \(6.6587_{-10}\) | 1.16564798 | \(2.022_{-4}\) |
0.6 | 1.15823600 | \(1.3109_{-6}\) | 1.158108073063764 | \(4.6515_{-11}\) | 1.15812382 | \(5.054_{-5}\) |
0.7 | 1.14972066 | \(1.9547_{-5}\) | 1.149603273305191 | \(5.0383_{-11}\) | 1.14960897 | \(3.427_{-4}\) |
0.8 | 1.14023972 | \(5.4729_{-6}\) | 1.140133388637926 | \(3.2844_{-11}\) | 1.14012396 | \(1.437_{-4}\) |
0.9 | 1.12980937 | \(3.8068_{-6}\) | 1.129712674036530 | \(1.7034_{-11}\) | 1.12969271 | \(4.717_{-4}\) |
1.0 | 1.11843798 | \(6.5566_{-6}\) | 1.118348529287161 | \(1.1143_{-11}\) | 1.11832927 | \(3.310_{-5}\) |