Table 1 Reading performance, expressed in terms of mean number of syllables per second (in word, non-word and text reading), and recorded for musicians (top rows) and controls (bottom rows) according to whether they were good or poor readers. Participants were ranked based on word reading time (from fastest to slowest) and, for simplicity, divided into the highest and lowest subgroups within their category. Reading speed was calculated by dividing the number of syllables read by the time (in seconds) taken to read them.

From: Music literacy improves reading skills via bilateral orthographic development

Proficiency

Words

Non_words

Text

Syl/Sec

#Errors

Syl/Sec

#Errors

Syl/Sec

#Errors

Musicians

 Good (N = 15)

6.74

0.46

4.14

1.49

7.60

10.40

 Poor (N = 15)

5.14

0.56

3.47

1.84

6.20

14.40

 Mean

5.94

0.51

3.805

1.67

6.9

12.4

Controls

 Good (N = 13)

6.28

0.48

4.10

1.69

7.17

10.69

 Poor (N = 13)

4.78

0.37

3.05

1.56

6.08

10.77

 Mean

5.53

0.42

3.375

1.62

6.625

10.73

Whole sample (normotypical readers)

 Group Mean

5.735

0.465

3.69

1.64

6.762

11.56

 Normative data, 1st year University students (Re et al., 2011)

5.14

–

3.21

–

5.96

–

  1. Average reading speeds (in syllables per second) for the group of musicians and controls (regardless of reading ability) and normative values for first-year university students are shown in bold.