Table 3 Statistical results of different methods on G1 problem (The best performing method (objective function values) is marked in bold).
From: Efficient implicit constraint handling approaches for constrained optimization problems
Algorithm | BU step | Best | Mean | Median | Worst | St. Dev |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA | Nonea | − 13.83 | − 12.87 | − 13.07 | − 11.99 | 0.68 |
BU | − 14.43 | − 13.94 | − 14.17 | − 13.02 | 0.48 | |
Hybrid-cvtol | − 15.0 | − 14.87 | − 14.95 | − 14.58 | 0.15 | |
Hybrid-ftol | − 15.0 | − 14.99 | − 14.99 | − 14.99 | 0.00 | |
DE | None | − 10.08 | − 8.83 | − 8.74 | − 8.10 | 0.66 |
BU | − 14.02 | − 12.61 | − 13.46 | − 9.55 | 1.62 | |
Hybrid-cvtol | − 14.80 | − 14.718 | − 14.710 | − 14.66 | 0.047 | |
Hybrid-ftol | − 14.35 | − 14.02 | − 14.05 | − 13.68 | 0.21 | |
ES | None | − 10.75 | − 9.24 | − 9.38 | − 8.13 | 0.89 |
BU | − 10.89 | − 9.89 | − 9.99 | − 8.98 | 0.65 | |
Hybrid-cvtol | − 13.41 | − 10.47 | − 9.84 | − 8.63 | 1.63 | |
Hybrid-ftol | − 10.77 | − 9.92 | − 10.0 | − 8.98 | 0.57 | |
SRES | None | − 7.40 | − 5.68 | − 5.85 | − 3.63 | 1.24 |
BU | − 9.05 | − 8.27 | − 8.18 | − 1.04 | 0.44 | |
Hybrid-cvtol | − 7.96 | − 5.10 | − 5.04 | − 1.04 | 1.68 | |
Hybrid-ftol | − 8.38 | − 5.51 | − 4.54 | − 3.27 | 1.84 | |
BRKGA | None | − 13.83 | − 12.46 | − 12.20 | − 11.30 | 0.89 |
BU | − 14.43 | − 13.56 | − 13.85 | − 11.54 | 1.03 | |
Hybrid-cvtol | − 14.90 | − 14.88 | − 14.88 | − 14.86 | 0.01 | |
Hybrid2-ftol | − 14.93 | − 14.87 | − 14.88 | − 14.85 | 0.02 |