Table 7 The evaluation result analysis.
From: The development of priority decision model for old urban community renovation in China
CIPP theory | Evaluation purpose | Analysis results | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Best | Better | General | ||
Context | The degree of conformity with the policy standards | \({I}_{1}\), \({I}_{5}\),\({I}_{7}\) | \({I}_{2}\), \({I}_{4}\), \({I}_{6}\),\({I}_{8}\) | \({I}_{3}\), \({I}_{9}\) |
Input | The rationality of renovation input | \({I}_{1}\), \({I}_{5}\) | \({I}_{2}\), \({I}_{3}\), \({I}_{4}\), \({I}_{7}\), \({I}_{8}\),\({I}_{9}\) | \({I}_{6}\) |
Process | Feasibility of the renovation process | \({I}_{4}\), \({I}_{7}\) | \({I}_{1}\), \({I}_{2}\), \({I}_{5}\),\({I}_{8}\) | \({I}_{3}\), \({I}_{6}\),\({I}_{9}\) |
Product | Expected renovation performance | \({I}_{7}\) | \({I}_{1}\), \({I}_{2}\), \({I}_{3}\),\({I}_{5}\) | \({I}_{4}\), \({I}_{6}\), \({I}_{8}\),\({I}_{9}\) |
