Table 1 Two-way ANOVA results with slope and perturbation type as independent factors.

From: Recovering whole-body angular momentum and margin of stability after treadmill-induced perturbations during sloped walking in healthy young adults

 

Two-way ANOVA results

Perturbation

Slope

Perturbation × slope

Ranges

df

F

Sig

\({\eta }_{p}^{2}\)

df

F

Sig

\({\eta }_{p}^{2}\)

df

F

Sig

\({\eta }_{p}^{2}\)

PR

MoS_AP

1

52.798

< .001

.756

2

6.577

.004

.279

2

12.998

< .001

.433

MoS_ML

1

6.236

.023

.268

2

3.589

.039

.174

2

1.211

.310

.067

Range

Sagittal (Z)

2

23.372

< .001

.579

2

31.752

< .001

.651

4

2.342

.064

.121

Frontal (X)

2

9.225

< .001

.352

2

40.345

< .001

.704

4

0.347

.845

.02

iWBAM

Sagittal (Z)

2

28.082

< .001

.623

2

46.913

< .001

.734

4

7.800

< .001

.315

Frontal (X)

2

13.999

< .001

.452

2

15.593

< .001

.478

4

1.505

.21

.081

Step length

2

58.951

< .001

.776

2

10.965

< .001

.392

4

2.326

.065

.120

Step width

2

36.576

< .001

.683

2

.713

.497

.040

4

2.586

.044

.132

  1. Perturbation types: slip, trip, and unperturbed.
  2. Slopes: downhill (− 8°); level (0°) and uphill (+ 8°).
  3. Statistical significance was set at \(\alpha < 0.05\) and effect sizes are shown as partial eta square (\({\eta }_{p}^{2}\)).
Back to article page