Table 4 Relationship between ALT/HDL-C ratio and the incident NAFLD in different models.
Variable | Model 1 (HR, 95% CI, P) | Model 2 (HR, 95% CI, P) | Model 3 (HR, 95% CI, P) | Model 4 (HR, 95% CI, P) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ALT/HDL-C ratio | 1.052 (1.048, 1.055) < 0.001 | 1.034 (1.030, 1.038) < 0.001 | 1.037 (1.031, 1.042) < 0.001 | 1.028 (1.022, 1.034) < 0.00001 |
ALT/HDL-C ratio (quartile) | ||||
Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Q2 | 2.317 (1.873, 2.867) < 0.001 | 1.796 (1.451, 2.223) < 0.001 | 1.795 (1.447, 2.226) < 0.001 | 1.580 (1.270, 1.965) < 0.001 |
Q3 | 4.727 (3.886, 5.750) < 0.001 | 3.011 (2.472, 3.668) < 0.001 | 2.951 (2.408, 3.618) < 0.001 | 2.350 (1.899, 2.909) < 0.001 |
Q4 | 8.440 (6.987, 10.195) < 0.001 | 4.469 (3.688, 5.416) < 0.001 | 4.417 (3.575, 5.457) < 0.001 | 3.317 (2.642, 4.164) < 0.001 |
P for trend | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |