Figure 3
From: Discrepancy of flowering time between genetically close sublineages of Aegilops umbellulata Zhuk.
Phenotypic traits different between UmbL1e and UmbL1w lineages in Aegilops umbellulata. (A) Effects of the lineage differentiations, the seasonal differences and the interaction between and UmbL1e, UmbL1w and UmbL2 lineages, the seasons, and the interaction between lineages and seasons on the phenotypic trait variations in Ae. umbellulata. Posterior distributions of mean for the traits were shown. Red and blue, yellow posterior distributions indicate mean values of UmbL2, UmbL1e and UmbL1w, respectively. The center point and thin line above/below the posterior distribution designate mean and 95% credible intervals, respectively. (B) A Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of the 87 Ae. umbllulata accessions. The number on the branches of the phylogenetic tree shows bootstrap probability with over 90%. (C) A flowering dendrogram of 87 accessions of Ae. umbellulata based on measurements for each season from 2017 to 2020. After normalizing days to flowering for each of the seasons 2017–2017, 2017–2018, 2018–2019, and 2019–2020, Euclidean distances were calculated. Hierarchical clustering with Ward method was carried out based on the Euclidean distance matrix. In all figures, the accessions are color-coded according to their lineages, UmbL1e, UmbL1w, and UmbL2 with blue, yellow, red. The color of external branches in the ML tree and dendrogram follows the aforementioned classification.
