Table 6 Percentage improvements in \({O}_{sh}\) and \({U}_{sh}\) for Case A.1.

From: Frequency regulation in a hybrid renewable power grid: an effective strategy utilizing load frequency control and redox flow batteries

Controller structures

\({\Delta {\text{f}}}_{{\text{a}}}\)

\({\Delta {\text{f}}}_{{\text{b}}}\)

\({\Delta {\text{P}}}_{{\text{tie}}}\)

\({U}_{sh}\)

\({O}_{sh}\)

\({U}_{sh}\)

\({O}_{sh}\)

\({U}_{sh}\)

\({O}_{sh}\)

FOPID-optimized via ESAOA18

26.93

93.07

44.72

91.39

40.73

90.15

PD-PI-optimized via HHO3

55.69

38.58

82.89

10.43

78.1

23.76

FO-(PD-PI)-optimized via MRFO3

67.3

97.84

89.11

100

87

100

Fuzzy-PID + (T \({{\varvec{I}}}^{{\varvec{\lambda}}}{{\varvec{D}}}^{{\varvec{\mu}}}\))-optimized via COA

95.64

82.88

95.86

2.87

93.17

25.02

  1. Optimal percentage values are highlighted in bold format.