Table 2 Summary of the calculations results that verify the significance of differences between mean values of bean and maize grins depending on their moisture content on a wet basis.

Bean grain length (Kruskala-Wallisa test) H (2. N = 60) = 35.98052; p = 0.0000

Variable –grain moisture [%]

Probability of multiple comparisons

Bean grain–moisture 9% R = 14.53

Bean grain–moisture 13% R = 29.55

Bean grain–moisture 17% R = 47.43

Bean grain width (ANOVA test) Efekt: F(1.056) = 2.2749; p = 0.1058

Variable –grain moisture [%]

Probability Duncan’s tests

Bean grain–moisture 9% X = 5.7933

Bean grain–moisture 13% X = 5.8700

Bean grain–moisture 17% X = 5.9800

Bean grain thickness (Kruskala-Wallisa test) H (2. N = 60) = 6.832006; p = 0.0328

Variable –seed moisture [%]

Probability of multiple comparisons

Bean grain–moisture 9% R = 25.60

Bean grain–moisture 13% R = 27.25

Bean grain–moisture 17% R = 38.65

Maize grain length (Kruskala-Wallisa test) H (2. N = 60) = 42.15251; p = 0.0000

Variable –grain moisture [%]

Probability of multiple comparisons

Maize grain–moisture 9% R = 13.75

Maize grain–moisture 13% R = 28.48

Maize grain–moisture 17% R = 49.28

Maize grain width (Kruskala-Wallisa test) H (2. N = 60) = 16.23271; p = 0.0003

Variable –grain moisture [%]

Probability Duncan’s tests

Maize grain–moisture 9% X = 22.57500

Maize grain–moisture 13% X = 25.97500

Maize grain–moisture 17% X = 42.95000

Maize grain thickness (Kruskala-Wallisa test) H (2. N = 60) = 29.40179; p = 0.0000

Variable –grain moisture [%]

Probability of multiple comparisons

Maize grain–moisture 9% R = 19.550

Maize grain–moisture 13% R = 24.68

Maize grain–moisture 17% R = 47.28