Table 3 Diagnostic accuracy of p-tau181, NfL and the combined model NfL + p-tau181 in predicting A, T, N and AP status.
SCD | MCI | SCD + MCI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A | Log p-tau181 | 0.79 [0.61–0.96] | 0.79 [0.61–0.96] | 0.81 [0.71–0.92] |
Log NfL | 0.80 [0.59–1] | 0.80 [0.59–1] | 0.77 [0.65–0.88] | |
NfL + p-tau181 | 0.81 [0.62–1] | 0.81 [0.62–1] | 0.84 [0.75–0.94] | |
T | Log p-tau181 | 0.88 [0.75–1] | 0.88 [0.75–1] | 0.89 [0.81–0.96] |
Log NfL | 0.88 [0.70–1] | 0.88 [0.70–1] | 0.82 [0.72–0.93] | |
NfL + p-tau181 | 0.92 [0.81–1] | 0.92 [0.81–1] | 0.92 [0.86–0.98] | |
N | Log p-tau181 | 0.68 [0.48–0.89] | 0.68 [0.48–0.89] | 0.81 [0.71–0.91] |
Log NfL | 0.69 [0.48–0.89] | 0.69 [0.48–0.90] | 0.74 [0.62–0.86] | |
NfL + p-tau181 | 0.68 [0.48–0.89] | 0.68 [0.48–0.89] | 0.80 [0.70–0.90] | |
AP status | Log p-tau181 | 0.88 [0.68–1] | 0.88 [0.76–1] | 0.89 [0.81–0.96] |
Log NfL | 0.88 [0.76–1] | 0.88 [0.65–1] | 0.81 [0.70–0.93] | |
NfL + p-tau181 | 0.93 [0.80–1] | 0.93 [0.80–1] | 0.92 [0.86–0.99] |