Table 17 Scoring and ranking.

From: Enhanced decision technique for optimized crude oil pretreatment under disc spherical fuzzy Aczel Alsina aggregation information

 

\(\wp (\Omega _{1})\)

\(\wp (\Omega _{2})\)

\(\wp (\Omega _{3})\)

\(\wp (\Omega _{4})\)

\(\wp (\Omega _{5})\)

Ranking

L-SFWA52

\(0.982\)

\(0.998\)

\(0.984\)

\(0.737\)

\(0.934\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

L-SFOWA52

\(0.980\)

\(0.993\)

\(0.987\)

\(0.613\)

\(0.903\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

L-SFHWA52

\(0.9995\)

\(0.9999\)

\(0.9997\)

\(0.646\)

\(0.984\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

L-SFWG52

\(0.979\)

\(0.995\)

\(0.972\)

\(0.622\)

\(0.926\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

L-SFOWG52

\(0.976\)

\(0.979\)

\(0.973\)

\(0.330\)

\(0.892\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

L-SFHWG52

\(0.9998\)

\(0.9999\)

\(0.9991\)

\(0.822\)

\(0.998\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

SFEWA53

\(0.472\)

\(0.529\)

\(0.523\)

\(0.426\)

\(0.458\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

SFEWG53

\(0.553\)

\(0.609\)

\(0.593\)

\(0.477\)

\(0.510\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

GSFEWA53

\(0.512\)

\(0.561\)

\(0.555\)

\(0.470\)

\(0.495\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

GSFEWG53

\(0.516\)

\(0.566\)

\(0.549\)

\(0.433\)

\(0.473\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

GSFEOWA53

\(0.512\)

\(0.562\)

\(0.556\)

\(0.470\)

\(0.496\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

GSFEOWG53

\(0.516\)

\(0.567\)

\(0.549\)

\(0.433\)

\(0.474\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

DSFAAWA

\(0.149\)

\(0.262\)

\(0.203\)

\(0.095\)

\(0.096\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

DSFAAWG

\(0.147\)

\(0.246\)

\(0.189\)

\(0.090\)

\(0.094\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)

Proposed method

\(0.471\)

\(0.810\)

\(0.631\)

\(0.300\)

\(0.318\)

\(\Omega _{2}>\Omega _{3}>\Omega _{1}>\Omega _{5}>\Omega _{4}\)