Table 2 Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale for cohort studies.
Study | Selection | Design or analysis controlled for confounders | Outcome | Quality score | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Representativeness of the case-cohort | Selection of the control cohort | Ascertainment of outcome | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at the start of the study | Assessment of the outcome | Follow-up was long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts | |||
Al-Murayeh et al. 18 | ★ | ★ | ★ | 0 | ★ | ★ | 0 | 0 | 6 (Fair) |
Al-Shahrani et al. 19 | ★ | ★ | ★ | 0 | ★ | ★ | 0 | 0 | 6 (Fair) |
Al-Khadra, 20 | ★ | 0 | ★ | 0 | ★ | ★ | 0 | 0 | 4 (Fair) |
Alghamdi et al. 21 | ★ | 0 | ★ | 0 | ★ | ★ | 0 | 0 | 4 (Fair) |
Sakr et al. 22 | ★ | ★ | ★ | 0 | ★ | ★ | 0 | 0 | 6 (Fair) |
Abazid et al. 23 | ★ | ★ | ★ | 0 | ★ | ★ | 0 | 0 | 6 (Fair) |
Al-Saif et al. 24 | ★ | ★ | ★ | 0 | ★ | ★ | 0 | 0 | 6 (Fair) |