Table 3 Associations between healthy lifestyle score and immune-inflammatory markers based on survey-weighted regression.

From: Associations of lifestyle characteristics with circulating immune markers in the general population based on NHANES 1999 to 2014

Outcomes

HLS 2 vs. HLS 0–1

HLS 3–4 vs. HLS 0–1

Adjusted β (95% CI)

P value

Adjusted β (95% CI)

P value

C-reactive protein (mg/dL)

 − 0.1195 (− 0.1977, − 0.0413)

0.004

 − 0.3213 (− 0.4085, − 0.2342)

 < 0.001

Platelet–lymphocyte ratio

0.0082 (− 0.0107, 0.0271)

0.397

0.0331 (0.0127, 0.0536)

0.002

Systemic immune-inflammation index

 − 0.0418 (− 0.0936, − 0.0206)

 < 0.001

 − 0.0690 (− 0.0936, − 0.0444)

 < 0.001

Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio

 − 0.0365 (− 0.0540, − 0.0189)

 < 0.001

 − 0.0551 (− 0.0752, − 0.0349)

 < 0.001

Monocyte–lymphocyte ratio

 − 0.0114 (− 0.0296, 0.0068)

0.221

 − 0.0025 (− 0.0234, 0.0185)

0.816

  1. These variables were adjusted: age, sex, race, education, family income-to-poverty ratio, marital status, employment and insurance.
  2. HLS healthy lifestyle score.
  3. Significant values are in bold.
Back to article page