Table 3 Relationship between CAP, LSM, MASLD status and CDAI in a multiple regression model.
Outcome | Crude model | Model I | Model II |
|---|---|---|---|
Beta (95% CI) | Beta (95% CI) | Beta (95% CI) | |
CDAI (CAP) | − 0.572 (− 1.120, − 0.025) | − 0.779 (− 1.269, − 0.289) | − 0.497 (− 0.833, − 0.160) |
Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Q2 | 3.044 (− 2.859, 8.946) | − 0.132 (− 5.653, 5.390) | 0.2 (− 2.154, 2.554) |
Q3 | 2.304 (− 3.113, 7.721) | − 1.283 (− 6.195, 3.628) | − 2.431 (− 5.699, 0.836) |
Q4 | − 2.25 (− 8.901, 4.401) | − 5.3 (− 11.606, 1.006) | − 3.574 (− 7.243, 0.095) |
p for trend | 0.257 | 0.042 | 0.038 |
Beta (95% CI) | Beta (95% CI) | Beta (95% CI) | |
CDAI (LSM) | 0.031 (− 0.011, 0.074) | 0.027 (− 0.017, 0.071) | 0.046 (0.007, 0.085) |
Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Q2 | − 0.438 (− 0.780, − 0.096) | − 0.518 (− 0.883, − 0.152) | − 0.44 (− 0.880, 0.001) |
Q3 | − 0.312 (− 0.675, 0.051) | − 0.408 (− 0.776, − 0.041) | − 0.36 (− 0.825, 0.106) |
Q4 | 0.039 (− 0.385, 0.463) | − 0.021 (− 0.465, 0.424) | 0.147 (− 0.275, 0.569) |
p for trend | 0.345 | 0.484 | 0.083 |
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
CDAI (MASLD) | 0.984 (0.967, 1.001) | 0.976 (0.960, 0.993) | 0.981 (0.961, 1.002) |
Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Q2 | 1.127 (0.912, 1.392) | 1.034 (0.834, 1.280) | 1.062 (0.833, 1.353) |
Q3 | 1.130 (0.920, 1.387) | 1.033 (0.846, 1.262) | 0.954 (0.747, 1.217) |
Q4 | 0.969 (0.769, 1.222) | 0.879 (0.695, 1.110) | 0.918 (0.700, 1.203) |
p for trend | 0.518 | 0.156 | 0.349 |
