Table 4 Results of comparison experiments on the BUSI dataset.

From: Multi-branch CNN and grouping cascade attention for medical image classification

Method(year)

Params (M)

FLOPs (G)

Acc

F1

Precision

Recall

Auc

ResNet50 (2016)

23.5

4.1

0.9000

0.8769

0.9164

0.8492

0.8909

MobileNetV2 (2018)

2.2

0.3

0.8667

0.8404

0.8849

0.8115

0.8598

EfficientNet-B0 (2019)

4.0

0.4

0.8800

0.8628

0.9063

0.8353

0.8756

RepVGG (2021)

43.7

9.9

0.9133

0.8964

0.9102

0.8869

0.9162

ConvNext-S (2022)

49.5

8.7

0.7667

0.6717

0.8503

0.6290

0.7283

ConvMixer (2023)

47.9

49.1

0.9067

0.8901

0.9006

0.8810

0.9117

InceptionNext-S (2023)

47.1

8.4

0.9000

0.8906

0.9066

0.8770

0.9060

FasterNet (2023)

13.7

1.9

0.9067

0.8907

0.9080

0.8790

0.9122

Swin-S (2021)

48.8

8.6

0.8400

0.8219

0.8515

0.8095

0.8521

CrossViT 18 (2021)

43.3

9.0

0.8600

0.8308

0.8679

0.8155

0.8619

MoCoViT 1.0 (2022)

7.2

0.5

0.8600

0.8373

0.8838

0.8095

0.8563

BiFormer-S (2023)

56.0

9.4

0.8733

0.8493

0.8950

0.8194

0.8653

FasterViT-2 (2023)

75.2

8.9

0.8968

0.9173

0.8867

0.8736

0.8712

Flatten-pvt (2023)

24.2

3.7

0.8667

0.8497

0.8811

0.8333

0.8720

TransxNet (2023)

25.5

4.6

0.8733

0.8576

0.8674

0.8492

0.8861

GroupMixFormer (2023)

22.1

5.1

0.8933

0.8657

0.9285

0.8294

0.8772

Eff-CTNet(Ours)

25.2

6.4

0.9333

0.9261

0.9326

0.9226

0.9404

  1. Bold indicates the optimal metric values among all compared methods.