Table 5 Results of comparison experiments on the COVID19-CT dataset.

From: Multi-branch CNN and grouping cascade attention for medical image classification

Method(year)

Params (M)

FLOPs (G)

Acc

F1

Precision

Recall

Auc

ResNet50 (2016)

23.5

4.1

0.8716

0.8774

0.8947

0.8608

0.8724

MobileNetV2 (2018)

2.2

0.3

0.8716

0.8805

0.8750

0.8861

0.8706

EfficientNet-B0 (2019)

4.0

0.4

0.9054

0.9079

0.9452

0.8734

0.9077

RepVGG (2021)

43.7

9.9

0.8986

0.9057

0.9000

0.9114

0.8977

ConvNext-S (2022)

49.5

8.7

0.7838

0.7922

0.8133

0.7722

0.7846

ConvMixer (2023)

47.9

49.1

0.8851

0.8957

0.8690

0.9241

0.8823

InceptionNext-S (2023)

47.1

8.4

0.8581

0.8662

0.8718

0.8608

0.8579

FasterNet (2023)

13.7

1.9

0.8784

0.8875

0.8765

0.8987

0.8769

Swin-S (2021)

48.8

8.6

0.7027

0.7609

0.6667

0.8861

0.6894

CrossViT 18 (2021)

43.3

9.0

0.7703

0.8023

0.7419

0.8734

0.7628

MoCoViT 1.0 (2022)

7.2

0.5

0.8784

0.8889

0.8675

0.9114

0.8760

BiFormer-S (2023)

56.0

9.4

0.8851

0.8903

0.9079

0.8734

0.8860

FasterViT-2 (2023)

75.2

8.9

0.8716

0.8742

0.9167

0.8354

0.8742

Flatten-pvt (2023)

24.2

3.7

0.8581

0.8591

0.9143

0.8101

0.8616

T ransxNet (2023)

25.5

4.6

0.8649

0.8701

0.8933

0.8481

0.8661

GroupMixFormer (2023)

22.1

5.1

0.9054

0.9103

0.9221

0.8987

0.9059

Eff-CTNet(Ours)

25.2

6.4

0.9257

0.9317

0.9146

0.9494

0.9240

  1. Bold indicates the optimal metric values among all compared methods.