Table 6 Results of comparison experiments on the Chaoyang dataset.

From: Multi-branch CNN and grouping cascade attention for medical image classification

Method(year)

Params (M)

FLOPs (G)

Acc

F1

Precision

Recall

Auc

ResNet50 (2016)

23.5

4.1

0.8266

0.7783

0.7740

0.7849

0.8643

MobileNetV2 (2018)

2.2

0.3

0.8242

0.7702

0.7738

0.7680

0.8547

EfficientNet-B0 (2019)

4.0

0.4

0.8532

0.8021

0.8074

0.7986

0.8745

RepVGG (2021)

43.7

9.9

0.8532

0.7999

0.8043

0.7960

0.8736

ConvNext-S (2022)

49.5

8.7

0.7835

0.7189

0.7155

0.7242

0.8262

ConvMixer (2023)

47.9

49.1

0.8340

0.7736

0.7827

0.7691

0.8562

InceptionNext-S (2023)

47.1

8.4

0.8481

0.7970

0.8023

0.7925

0.8705

FasterNet (2023)

13.7

1.9

0.8439

0.7936

0.8025

0.7889

0.8682

Swin-S (2021)

48.8

8.6

0.8513

0.8029

0.8109

0.7983

0.8744

CrossViT 18 (2021)

43.3

9.0

0.8125

0.7529

0.7674

0.7436

0.8391

BiFormer-S (2023)

56.0

9.4

0.8312

0.7628

0.7860

0.7591

0.8503

FasterViT-2 (2023)

75.2

8.9

0.8320

0.7577

0.7745

0.7483

0.8454

Flatten-pvt (2023)

24.2

3.7

0.8396

0.7877

0.8035

0.7766

0.8605

TransxNet (2023)

25.5

4.6

0.8439

0.7886

0.8039

0.7786

0.8627

GroupMixFormer (2023)

22.1

5.1

0.8537

0.7971

0.8167

0.7844

0.8667

Eff-CTNet(Ours)

25.2

6.4

0.8635

0.8090

0.8191

0.8012

0.8776

  1. Bold indicates the optimal metric values among all compared methods.