Table 2 Different layups and CTE performance results.
Layup | Ply staking sequence | \({\alpha }_{x} ({10}^{-6}/\text{K})\) | \({\alpha }_{y} ({10}^{-6}/\text{K})\) |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | \({\text{[45/}-\text{45/0/90/90/0/}-\text{45/45/90/0]}}_{s}\) | 1.439 | 1.439 |
2 | \({\text{[45/}-\text{45/0/90/0/60/}-\text{60/0/90/0]}}_{s}\) | 1.103 | 1.843 |
3 | \({\text{[45/}-\text{45/0/60/}-\text{60/0/90/}-\text{45/45/0]}}_{s}\) | 0.9777 | 1.993 |
4 | \({\text{[45/}-\text{45/30/}-\text{30/60/}-\text{60/0/45/-45/0]}}_{s}\) | 0.1972 | 3.231 |
5 | \({\text{[37.08/}-\text{59.45/31.38/}-\text{57.01/16.64/}-\text{16.64/57.01/}-\text{31.38/59.45/}-\text{37.08]}}_{s}\) | 0.5314 | 2.601 |
6 | \({\text{[32.61/}-\text{53.67/37.04/}-\text{56.86/32.65/}-\text{32.65/56.86/}-\text{37.04/53.67/}-\text{32.61]}}_{s}\) | 0.5242 | 2.502 |
7 | \({\text{[30.49/}-\text{51.63/36.10/}-\text{60.38/30.44/}-\text{30.44/60.38/}-\text{36.10/51.63/}-\text{30.49]}}_{s}\) | 0.4338 | 2.662 |
8 | \({\text{[40.56/}-\text{37.26/50.84/}-\text{25.04/55.81/}-\text{55.81/25.04/}-\text{50.84/37.26/}-\text{40.56]}}_{s}\) | 0.3548 | 2.736 |
9 | \({\text{[45.40/}-\text{7.540/}-\text{64.58/26.59/}-\text{26.14/64.58/}-\text{26.59/7.540/26.14/}-\text{45.40]}}_{s}\) | 0.0076 | 3.970 |
10 | \({\text{[13.40/}-\text{10.49/13.98/}-\text{65.31/1.055/}-\text{13.40/10.49/}-\text{13.98/65.31/}-\text{1.055]}}_{s}\) | 0.0032 | 6.443 |