Table 2 Different layups and CTE performance results.

From: Multi-optimization for thermal deformation of gravitational wave telescope based on CFRP characteristics

Layup

Ply staking sequence

\({\alpha }_{x} ({10}^{-6}/\text{K})\)

\({\alpha }_{y} ({10}^{-6}/\text{K})\)

1

\({\text{[45/}-\text{45/0/90/90/0/}-\text{45/45/90/0]}}_{s}\)

1.439

1.439

2

\({\text{[45/}-\text{45/0/90/0/60/}-\text{60/0/90/0]}}_{s}\)

1.103

1.843

3

\({\text{[45/}-\text{45/0/60/}-\text{60/0/90/}-\text{45/45/0]}}_{s}\)

0.9777

1.993

4

\({\text{[45/}-\text{45/30/}-\text{30/60/}-\text{60/0/45/-45/0]}}_{s}\)

0.1972

3.231

5

\({\text{[37.08/}-\text{59.45/31.38/}-\text{57.01/16.64/}-\text{16.64/57.01/}-\text{31.38/59.45/}-\text{37.08]}}_{s}\)

0.5314

2.601

6

\({\text{[32.61/}-\text{53.67/37.04/}-\text{56.86/32.65/}-\text{32.65/56.86/}-\text{37.04/53.67/}-\text{32.61]}}_{s}\)

0.5242

2.502

7

\({\text{[30.49/}-\text{51.63/36.10/}-\text{60.38/30.44/}-\text{30.44/60.38/}-\text{36.10/51.63/}-\text{30.49]}}_{s}\)

0.4338

2.662

8

\({\text{[40.56/}-\text{37.26/50.84/}-\text{25.04/55.81/}-\text{55.81/25.04/}-\text{50.84/37.26/}-\text{40.56]}}_{s}\)

0.3548

2.736

9

\({\text{[45.40/}-\text{7.540/}-\text{64.58/26.59/}-\text{26.14/64.58/}-\text{26.59/7.540/26.14/}-\text{45.40]}}_{s}\)

0.0076

3.970

10

\({\text{[13.40/}-\text{10.49/13.98/}-\text{65.31/1.055/}-\text{13.40/10.49/}-\text{13.98/65.31/}-\text{1.055]}}_{s}\)

0.0032

6.443