Table 5 The comparison of mean JACQLQ ver.1 score between this study and Fukagawa’s study in 2012 (Fukagawa et al. 2012).
Fukagawa’s multi-center study (2012): 648cases | Yamana Eye Clinice (2019–2021): 110cases | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score of eye symptoms | Score of nasal symptoms | Score of eye symptoms | Score of nasal symptoms | |
SAC | 5.6 points | 3.6 points | 5.0 points | 4.6 points |
PAC | 5.6 points | 3.6 points | 5.2 points | 2.6 points |
VKC | 5.0 points | 4.2 points | 10.0 points | 7.0 points |
SAC + PAC | 5.4 points | 5.0 points | ||
Total | 4.8 points | 3.1 points | 5.2 points | 3.8 points |
Fukagawa’s multi-center study (2012): 648cases | Yamana Eye Clinice (2019–2021): 110cases | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score of impediments of life | Score of moods | Score of impediments of life | Score of moods | |
SAC | 5.4 points | 3.9 points | 5.4 points | 2.7 points |
PAC | 5.2 points | 3.9 points | 4.7 points | 3.1 points |
VKC | 7.0 points | 3.7 points | 13.5 points | 9.5 points |
SAC + PAC | 8.3 points | 4.1 points | ||
Total | 4.7 points | 3.8 points | 6.0 points | 3.3 points |