Table 11 Reported prevalence of os intermetatarseum in the literature.
From: Accessory foot bones in a Portuguese identified skeletal collection
Reference | Prevalence | Sample | Frequency basis |
|---|---|---|---|
Gruber (1864)3 | 8.0% | 100 | Individual |
Pfitzner (1896)6 | 12.5% | 313 | Individual |
Dwight (1907)7 | 10.0% | – | – |
Geist (1915)8 | 0.0% | 100 | Individual |
Bizarro (1921)45 | 0.0% | 100 | Foot |
Heimerzheim (1925)49 | 0.4% | 1800 | Foot |
Case et al. (1998)21 | 3.5% | 971 | Individual |
Cilli and Akcaoglu (2005)14 | 0.2% | 464 (♂) | – |
Coskun et al. (2009)41 | 0.2% | 984 | Foot |
Kalbouneh et al. (2017)13 | 0.2% | 1000 | Individual |
Present study | 0.8% | 486 | Individual |
