Table 6 Prevalence of os trigonum reported in the literature.
From: Accessory foot bones in a Portuguese identified skeletal collection
Reference | Prevalence | Sample size | Frequency basis |
---|---|---|---|
Stieda (1889)4 | 0.8% | 120 | – |
Pfitzner (1896)6 | 6.1% | 841 | – |
Sewell (1904)48 | 10.9% | 1006 | – |
Geist (1915)8 | – | 100 | – |
Bizarro (1921)45 | 7.0% | 100 | Foot |
Heimerzheim (1925)49 | 4.3% | 1800 | – |
Mann and Owsley (1990)20 | 1.7% | 300 | – |
Cilli and Akcaoglu (2005)14 | 23.6% | 464 | – |
Coskun et al. (2009)41 | 2.3% | 984 | – |
Vasiljević et al. (2010)59 | 2.6% | 270 | – |
Zwiers et al. (2018)15 | 32.5% | 1256 | Individual |
Kalbouneh et al. (2017)13 | 15.4% | 1000 | Individual |
Present study | 9.9% | 485 | Individual |