Table 1 Weights of the alternatives for various values of “\(\eta\) and \(\gamma\)” using procedure I.

From: An intuitionistic fuzzy graph’s variation coefficient measure with application to selecting a reliable alliance partner

\(\eta\)

\({w}_{p}^{2}(p=\text{1,2},3)\)

\(\gamma\)

\({w}_{p}\)

\({\mathcalligra{t}}_{i}\)

0.3

(0.2503, 0.2051)

0.3

(0.1637, 0.1634)

(0.1851, 0.1105)

 

(0.1879, 0.2065)

 

(0.1448, 0.1690)

(0.1567, 0.1425)

 

(0.2068, 0.1884)

 

(0.1715, 0.1476)

(0.1136, 0.1216)

    

(0.1213, 0.2009)

0.5

(0.3422, 0.3418)

0.5

(0.3423, 0.3407)

(0.3861, 0.2302)

 

(0.3132, 0.3442)

 

(0.3041, 0.3506)

(0.3266, 0.2968)

 

(0.3446, 0.3141)

 

(0.3547, 0.3089)

(0.2363, 0.2535)

    

(0.2526, 0.4189)

0.7

(0.4791, 0.4785)

0.7

(0.5686, 0.5726)

(0.6467, 0.3865)

 

(0.4385, 0.4819)

 

(0.5134, 0.5872)

(0.5471, 0.4984)

 

(0.4824, 0.4397)

 

(0.5930, 0.5203)

(0.3956, 0.4259)

    

(0.4227, 0.7040)

0.9

(0.6160, 0.6152)

0.9

(0.8608, 0.8592)

(0.9738, 0.5796)

 

(0.5638, 0.6196)

 

(0.7728, 0.8789)

(0.8233, 0.7475)

 

(0.6203, 0.5653)

 

(0.8865, 0.7820)

(0.5946, 0.6389)

    

(0.6357, 1.0569)