Table 9 Comparison with non-AI methods.

From: Bayesian-optimized LSTM-DWT approach for reliable fault detection in MMC-based HVDC systems

Protection method

Detection method

Fault resistance

Noise issue

Sampling rate (kHz)

Communication link

Calculation rate

Other remarks

Ref.43

Overcurrent criteria

Low (5.0 Ω)

Yes

100.0

No

Medium

Limited performance in long-distance HVDC transmission

Ref.44

Capacitor-discharging

Low (10.0 Ω)

Yes

2.0

Yes

Higher

In a detailed study, we set the fault resistance to zero

Ref.45

DWT

Medium (400.0 Ω)

Yes

500.0

No

Medium

The sampling rate is very high

Ref.46 -

Voltage change-rate

High

No

200.0

No

Lower

Further scrutiny is required to examine bias and the challenges of managing high sampling rates

Ref.47

Threshold barriers via voltage/current signals

Not discussed

Yes

50.0

Yes

Higher

Detailed modelling and precise measurements are required to determine a threshold boundary. These models are susceptible to noise signals generated by the measuring instrument

Ref.48

The voltage across bus terminals serves as the basis for establishing threshold barriers

Low (10.0 Ω)

No

200.0

Yes

Higher

The classifier must be trained again and reset if some modifications occur in the system suitable for the multivendor application

Ref.49

Naïve Bayes classifier

Low (10.0 Ω)

NA

10.0

Yes

Higher

While the operating speed is satisfactory, further investigation regarding high fault resistance is needed

Ref.50

Current differential

Medium (300.0 Ω)

NA

10.0

Yes

Small

High fault resistance is studied successfully; unwanted delays to avoid sensitivity and maloperation need consideration

Ref.51

Current signal

Medium (200.0 Ω)

No

50.0

No

Medium

A large time window slows down the reaction time

Proposed method

Improved LSTM

High (480.0 Ω)

No

 

No

Low

Read non-AI based methods section