Table 13 Dominance and marginal analysis.

From: Influence of sowing dates and weed management practices on weed dynamics, productivity and profitability of direct seeded rice

Treatments*

GI (US$ ha−1)

GE/TC (US$ ha−1)

NFB (US$ ha−1)

% change (US$ ha−1)

MC (US$ ha−1)

MFB (US$ ha−1)

MRR (%)

D2W1

843.19

760.93

82.26

    

D1W1

1041.15

760.93

280.22

241

0

197.96

–

D2W3

1290.10

776.13

513.97

525

15.20

233.76

1538

D1W3

1491.37

776.13

715.24

769

0

201.27

–

D2W4

1147.50

778.29

369.21 D

349

–

–

–

D1W4

1477.25

778.29

698.96

750

2.15

16.28

756

D2W5

1401.95

778.83

623.12 D

658

–

–

–

D1W5

1575.34

778.83

796.51

868

0.54

97.54

18,108

D2W6

1294.57

780.98

513.59 D

524

–

–

–

D1W6

1530.80

780.98

749.82

812

2.15

46.69

2167

D2W2

1454.14

952.47

501.68 D

510

–

–

–

D1W2

1699.67

952.47

747.20

808

171.48

2.61

2

  1. GI gross income, GE/TC gross expenditure/total cost, NFB net field benefit, MC marginal cost, MFB marginal net field benefit, MRR marginal rate of return, D dominant.
  2. *Treatments are arranged in order of their increasing gross expenditure/total cost.
Back to article page