Table 3 Density (No.m−2) of grassy weeds in Direct Seeded Rice in relation to changing sowing time and weed managing approaches (2 year pooled data).

From: Influence of sowing dates and weed management practices on weed dynamics, productivity and profitability of direct seeded rice

Treatments

30 DAS

45 DAS

60 DAS

At harvest

Sowing date

 D1: May 10th

2.15 (4.25)

2.69 (7.32)

2.98 (9.34)

2.74 (7.60)

 D2: June 3rd

2.53 (6.17)

3.03 (9.42)

3.30 (11.51)

3.09 (9.79)

SE(m) ± 

0.06

0.05

0.006

0.03

CD (p ≤ 0.05)

0.19

0.16

0.019

0.09

Weed managing approach

 W1: weedy check

3.72 (12.91)

4.50 (19.30)

5.11 (25.22)

4.54 (19.72)

 W2: four conoweedings (equivalent to weed free)

1.00 (0.00)

1.00 (0.00)

1.00 (0.00)

1.00 (0.00)

 W3: BSM + pretilachlor, PE

2.45 (5.09)

2.94 (7.74)

3.17 (9.19)

3.00 (8.10)

 W4: oxyfluorfen, PE

2.52 (5.46)

3.45 (11.00)

3.60 (12.03)

3.50 (11.35)

 W5: bensulfuron methyl + pretilachlor (PE) fb 2, 4-D (PoE)

2.17 (3.84)

2.47 (5.21)

2.86 (7.29)

2.57 (5.72)

 W6: oxyfluorfen (PE) fb 2, 4-D (PoE)

2.20 (3.97)

2.80 (6.96)

3.11 (8.82)

2.87 (7.31)

SE(m) ± 

0.07

0.07

0.08

0.06

CD (p ≤ 0.05)

0.20

0.23

0.25

0.20

  1. Figures in parenthesis are original values, data subjected to √x + 1 transformation.