Table 8 Dry weight (g m−2) of BLWs in Direct Seeded Rice in relation to changing sowing time and weed managing approaches (2 year pooled data).

From: Influence of sowing dates and weed management practices on weed dynamics, productivity and profitability of direct seeded rice

Treatments

30 DAS

45 DAS

60 DAS

At Harvest

Sowing date

 D1: May 10th

2.69 (13.94)

3.07 (10.23)

3.73 (10.94)

3.13 (10.64)

 D2: June 3rd

3.08 (18.18)

3.52 (13.56)

4.4 (15.29)

3.59 (14.05)

SE (m) ± 

0.01

0.03

0.01

0.03

CD (p ≤ 0.05)

0.05

0.10

0.05

0.10

Weed managing practices

 W1: weedy check

5.16 (46.19)

5.77 (32.47)

6.56 (30.11)

5.84 (32.82)

 W2: four conoweedings (equivalent to weed free)

1.00 (0.00)

1.00 (0.00)

1.00 (0.00)

1.00 (0.00)

 W3: Bensulfuron methyl + pretilachlor (PE)

2.90 (13.57)

3.41 (10.75)

4.27 (12.48)

3.50 (11.39)

 W4: oxyfluorfen, PE

3.03 (14.95)

3.41 (10.75)

4.41 (13.35)

3.53 (11.63)

 W5: bensulfuron methyl + pretilachlor (PE) fb 2, 4-D (PoE)

2.49 (9.57)

3.00 (8.10)

3.9 (10.45)

3.02 (8.30)

 W6: oxyfluorfen (PE) fb 2, 4-D (PoE)

2.76 (12.10)

3.19 (9.33)

4.21 (12.29)

3.29 (9.94)

SE(m) ± 

0.05

0.05

0.03

0.04

CD (p ≤ 0.05)

0.16

0.15

0.11

0.14

  1. Figures in parenthesis are original values, data subjected to √x + 1 transformation.