Table 8 Dimensions of the femur and tibia of Pharaoh and Japanese quails slaughtered at 6 weeks of age.

From: The influence of genotype and sex on carcass composition, meat quality, digestive system morphometry and leg bone dimensions in Japanese quails (C. coturnix japonica)

Trait

Genotype

Sex

SEM

P values

Pharaoh quail

Japanese quail

Male

Female

G

S

S × G

Femur dimensions (mm)

 GL

40.34

39.86

39.48

40.72*

0.199

0.165

0.001

0.037

 ML

38.22

38.25

37.57

38.90*

0.201

0.925

0.001

0.024

 GB

6.86a

6.37b

6.59

6.64

0.092

0.007

0.768

0.398

 GD

3.76a

3.38b

3.53

3.61

0.081

0.034

0.624

0.884

 SM

2.95a

2.61b

2.81

2.75

0.047

0.001

0.484

0.234

 GC

5.94a

5.37b

5.55

5.77

0.084

0.001

0.122

0.349

 GE

4.61a

4.28b

4.31

4.58

0.076

0.029

0.074

0.403

Tibia dimensions (mm)

 GL

49.42b

50.49a

49.42

50.49*

0.297

0.049

0.047

0.011

 AL

47.74b

48.39a

47.83

48.30

0.158

0.027

0.098

0.015

 GD

7.40a

6.79b

7.08

7.12

0.079

< 0.001

0.792

0.317

 SB

2.70a

2.48b

2.62

2.56

0.043

0.007

0.474

0.067

 SD

5.05a

4.69b

4.93

4.81

0.066

0.005

0.321

0.284

 DD

4.95a

4.54b

4.68

4.81

0.057

< 0.001

0.198

0.139

  1. Femur dimensions: GL, greatest length; ML, medial length; GB, greatest breadth of proximal end; GD, greatest depth of proximal end; SM, smallest breadth of the corpus; GC, greatest breadth of the distal end; GE, greatest depth of distal end. Tibia dimensions: GL, greatest length; AL, axial length; GD, greatest diagonal of the proximal end; SB, smallest breadth of the corpus; SD, greatest breadth of the distal end; DD, greatest depth of the distal end.
  2. S sex; G genotype; S × G interaction between genotype and sex; SEM standard error of the mean. n = 20 for genotype or sex, 10 males and 10 females within a given genotype.
  3. a,bAre the means with different superscripts are statistically different between Pharaoh and Japanese quail P value < 0.05; *statistical differences between males and females P value < 0.05.