Table 3 LC detection outcome of LCD-DOAEL method with 80%TRAPH/20%TESPH.
Class labels | \(Acc{u}_{racy}\) | \(Pre{c}_{n}\) | \(Rec{a}_{l}\) | \({F}_{Score}\) | \(AU{C}_{Score}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
80%TRAPH | |||||
 He | 96.02 | 93.88 | 89.49 | 91.63 | 93.81 |
 Hbv | 96.97 | 92.70 | 95.49 | 94.07 | 96.48 |
 Le | 96.12 | 89.08 | 96.20 | 92.50 | 96.14 |
 IPCL | 95.74 | 94.47 | 88.52 | 91.40 | 93.37 |
 Average | 96.21 | 92.53 | 92.42 | 92.40 | 94.95 |
20%TESPH | |||||
 He | 97.73 | 100.00 | 91.78 | 95.71 | 95.89 |
 Hbv | 98.11 | 92.75 | 100.00 | 96.24 | 98.75 |
 Le | 98.48 | 94.37 | 100.00 | 97.10 | 98.98 |
 IPCL | 95.83 | 92.98 | 88.33 | 90.60 | 93.19 |
 Average | 97.54 | 95.03 | 95.03 | 94.91 | 96.70 |