Table 1 Summary of the analytical conditions, total secondary ion counts, count rates in counts per second, and yields of the 6 targets examined in CNS mode.

From: Ultrahigh-resolution imaging of biogenic phosphorus and molybdenum in palaeoproterozoic gunflint microfossils

        

Total count

Counts per second (cps)

Yield (cps/pA)

Active area based yield (cps/pA/area)

Fco

Target ID

Image

Frames

Sec/frm

Pixels

Scanned area (μm2)

Active area (%)

12C

12C14N

32S

12C

12C14N

32S

12C

12C14N

32S

12C

12C14N

32S

0.94

1

Fig. 2a

20

30

256 × 256

16 × 16

19

1.46E + 06

1.10E + 06

1.02E + 05

2,433

1,838

169

2,588

1,955

180

13,768

10,400

958

 

2

Fig. 2b

20

30

256 × 256

18 × 18

26

2.47E + 06

2.06E + 06

2.60E + 05

4,118

3,432

434

4,381

3,651

461

16,722

13,935

1,761

 

3

Fig. 2c

20

30

256 × 256

17 × 17

24

2.87E + 06

1.38E + 06

2.04E + 05

4,782

2,292

340

5,087

2,438

362

21,463

10,288

1,528

 

4

Fig. 2d

20

30

256 × 256

18 × 18

17

2.02E + 06

9.56E + 05

1.28E + 05

3,373

1,593

213

3,589

1,695

227

21,109

9,968

1,335

 

5

Fig. 2e

20

30

256 × 256

19 × 19

28

4.53E + 06

3.18E + 06

4.60E + 05

7,543

5,295

766

8,024

5,633

815

28,864

20,261

2,931

 

6

Fig. 2f

20

30

256 × 256

20 × 20

19

2.52E + 06

1.72E + 06

1.96E + 05

4,201

2,869

327

4,469

3,052

347

23,646

16,147

1,839

          

Averages

4,408

2,886

375

4,710

3,287

428

20,929

13,500

1,725

2.5

Gunflintia (sheath)*

 

30

30

256 × 256

20 × 20

28

1.33E + 06

2.74E + 05

5.70E + 04

1,475

305

63

590

122

25

2,092

432

90

 

Gunflintia (sheath)*

 

60

30

256 × 256

35 × 35

33

9.22E + 05

9.32E + 04

3.51E + 04

512

52

20

205

21

8

614

62

23

 

Gunflintia (sheath)*

 

30

30

256 × 256

30 × 30

28

1.10E + 06

1.57E + 05

3.84E + 04

1,220

174

43

488

70

17

1,756

251

61

          

Averages

1,069

177

42

428

71

17

1,487

248

58

  1. Fco: intensity of the primary beam; sec/frm: seconds for obtaining 1 frame of an image; scanned area: size of images in Fig. 2; active area: percentage of where carbon counts were observed from microfossils.
  2. *Data are cited and recalculated from the same type of microfossil reported by Sasaki et al. (2022).