Table 1 Abundance (proportional abundance of species), richness, diversity, and evenness of phyllostomid bats captured in four types of tree cover, and studied landscape.

From: Response of phyllostomid bat diversity to tree cover types in North-western Ecuador

Species

Trophic

guilds

*

Threat

status

**

Tree cover types

Landscape

PLF

MLF

C

ITP

 

Glossophaga soricina

N

LC

27 (0.206)

24 (0.462)

13 (0.371)

13 (0.406)

77 (0.308)

Sturnira bakeri

F

LC

21 (0.160)

5 (0.096)

8 (0.229)

5 (0.156)

39 (0.156)

Carollia perspicillata

F

LC

14 (0.107)

5 (0.096)

3 (0.086)

10 (0.313)

32 (0.128)

Carollia brevicauda

F

LC

20 (0.153)

5 (0.096)

3 (0.086)

 

28 (0.112)

Artibeus aequatorialis

F

LC

16 (0.122)

4 (0.077)

1 (0.029)

 

21 (0.084)

Uroderma convexum

F

LC

12 (0.092)

3 (0.058)

6 (0.171)

 

21 (0.084)

Artibeus ravus

F

LC

5 (0.038)

2 (0.038)

 

1 (0.031)

8 (0.032)

Vampyriscus nymphaea

F

VU

5 (0.038)

3 (0.058)

  

8 (0.032)

Chiroderma villosum

F

LC

6 (0.046)

1 (0.019)

  

7 (0.028)

Desmodus rotundus

S

LC

   

3 (0.094)

3 (0.012)

Chiroderma sp.

F

?

1 (0.008)

   

1 (0.004)

Chiroderma salvini

F

LC

1 (0.008)

   

1 (0.004)

Lonchophylla robusta

N

LC

1 (0.008)

   

1 (0.004)

Micronycteris hirsuta

A

LC

  

1 (0,029)

 

1 (0.004)

Garderycteris crenulatum keenani

A

NT

1 (0.008)

   

1 (0.004)

Platyrrhinus dorsalis chocoensis

F

VU

1 (0.008)

   

1 (0.004)

Total abundance

  

131

52

35

32

250

Observed richness

  

14

9

7

5

16

Diversity, exp. Shannon index

  

8.94

5.81

5.10

3.86

8.01

Evenness, Pielou index

  

0.83

0.80

0.84

0.84

0.75

  1.   *: Trophic guilds are based in food habits46,49 : N = nectarivorous, F = frugivorous, S = sanguivorous, A = animalivorous. PLF = polyspecific live fence, MLF = monospecific live fence, C =  Theobroma cacao plantation, ITP = isolated trees in pastures. ** Threat status: LC = least concern, NT = near threatened, VU = vulnerable42.