Table 1 Machine learning techniques to classify and extract relevant patterns from plant stresses and plant disease.
Ref. | Methodology | Findings | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
YOLOV3, CV2, RNN | Real-time plant leaf analysis with Tiny-YOLOv3, outperforming Faster R-CNN in speed and performance. | Tiny-YOLOv3 enhances leaf de- tection over Faster R-CNN but needs further research | |
OpenCV, K-means clustering, CART | Tomato yield ML model RGB cam- era, no filter changes. | Threshold variability, tomato focus, and recall discrepancies | |
RESNET, R- CNN, SVM | DL survey in visual object detection, covering architectures, learning strategies. | interpretability issues, dataset reliance, biases, and computational complexity | |
YOLO, SSD, LENET, RESNET | Spotlights DCNNs’ superior object detection, current/future DL trends. Review paper on DCNN-based and traditional approaches. | High computational demands, interpretability issues, and need for extensive labeled datasets. | |
TORCH, TEN- SORFLOW, KERAS | Recent advancements in DL and CNN. Aims to clarify techniques and assess cutting-edge systems and frameworks. | interpretability, dataset size, bi- ases, and resource intensity. Urges resolution for ethical and efficient deployment |