Table 5 Comparison results of different segmentation algorithms in DRIVE,[Key: Best, Second Best].
Methods | F1 | Acc | AUC | Sp | Se |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yu44 | – | 95.24 | 97.23 | 98.03 | 76.43 |
DUNet45 | 82.37 | 95.66 | 98.02 | 98.00 | 79.63 |
Yan46 | – | 95.38 | 97.50 | 98.20 | 76.31 |
U-Net++47 | 81.92 | 96.88 | 98.12 | – | – |
CTF-Net48 | 82.41 | 95.67 | 97.88 | – | – |
CcNet49 | – | 95.28 | 96.78 | 98.09 | 76.25 |
Yang30 | – | 95.79 | – | 97.51 | 83.53 |
Xu28 | – | 96.64 | 98.28 | 98.02 | 82.43 |
Ours (w/o background decoder) | 82.48 ± 1.38 | 96.88 ± 0.23 | 98.66 ± 0.37 | 98.12 ± 0.47 | 84.21 ± 4.88 |
Ours (TCDDU-Net) | 82.65 ± 1.57 | 96.98 ± 0.25 | 98.68 ± 0.37 | 98.38 ± 0.42 | 82.58 ± 5.18 |