Table 6 Comparison results of different segmentation algorithms in STARE,[Key: Best, Second Best].
Methods | F1 | Acc | AUC | Sp | Se |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yu44 | – | 96.13 | 97.87 | 98.22 | 78.37 |
DUNet45 | 81.43 | 96.41 | 98.32 | 98.78 | 75.95 |
Yan46 | – | 96.38 | 98.33 | 98.57 | 77.35 |
U-Net++47 | 78.59 | 97.57 | 97.63 | – | – |
CTF-Net48 | – | – | – | – | – |
CcNet49 | – | 96.33 | 97.00 | 98.48 | 77.09 |
Yang30 | – | 96.26 | – | 98.21 | 79.46 |
Xu28 | – | 96.92 | 98.12 | 97.90 | 85.04 |
Ours (w/o background decoder) | 81.10 ± 4.41 | 97.18 ± 0.49 | 98.60 ± 0.73 | 98.37 ± 0.50 | 82.24 ± 8.15 |
Ours (TCDDU-Net) | 81.63 ± 5.53 | 97.40 ± 0.64 | 98.56 ± 0.88 | 98.84 ± 0.32 | 79.20 ± 9.41 |