Table 7 Comparison results of different segmentation algorithms in CHASE,[Key: Best, Second Best].
Methods | F1 | Acc | AUC | Sp | Se |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yu44 | – | – | – | – | – |
DUNet45 | 78.83 | 96.10 | 98.04 | 97.52 | 81.55 |
Yan46 | – | 96.07 | 97.76 | 98.06 | 76.40 |
U-Net++47 | 81.34 | 97.62 | 98.35 | – | – |
CTF-Net48 | – | – | – | – | – |
CcNet49 | – | – | – | – | – |
Yang30 | – | 96.32 | – | 97.76 | 81.76 |
Xu28 | – | 96.85 | 98.40 | 97.60 | 86.19 |
Ours (w/o background decoder) | 78.04 ± 1.84 | 97.19 ± 0.42 | 98.43 ± 0.27 | 98.21 ± 0.47 | 81.42 ± 3.45 |
Ours (TCDDU-Net) | 78.38 ± 1.68 | 97.23 ± 0.40 | 98.50 ± 0.23 | 98.23 ± 0.45 | 81.87 ± 2.99 |