Table 3 Evaluation of the classification skills of our strategy against GPM, ERA5, its 2-km dynamical downscaled reanalysis VHR, and LR for the L1 region.

From: Accurate and efficient AI-assisted paradigm for adding granularity to ERA5 precipitation reanalysis

Metric

Task

1 h

12 h

24 h

  

AI

GPM

ERA5

VHR

LR

AI

GPM

ERA5

VHR

LR

AI

GPM

ERA5

VHR

LR

Precision

Calibration

0.64

0.43

0.31

0.52

0.61

0.78

0.58

0.46

0.68

0.75

0.80

0.64

0.55

0.74

0.78

Regionalization

0.64

0.42

0.30

0.52

0.60

0.77

0.56

0.47

0.68

0.73

0.80

0.62

0.55

0.74

0.77

Recall

Calibration

0.62

0.50

0.81

0.41

0.59

0.72

0.64

0.86

0.56

0.70

0.76

0.71

0.89

0.62

0.76

Regionalization

0.64

0.53

0.81

0.42

0.61

0.74

0.67

0.87

0.56

0.72

0.78

0.74

0.89

0.62

0.76

F1

Calibration

0.63

0.46

0.44

0.46

0.60

0.75

0.61

0.60

0.61

0.72

0.79

0.67

0.68

0.67

0.78

Regionalization

0.64

0.47

0.44

0.46

0.60

0.75

0.61

0.61

0.61

0.72

0.80

0.67

0.68

0.67

0.77

Accuracy

Calibration

0.93

0.88

0.80

0.90

0.92

0.88

0.79

0.71

0.81

0.86

0.85

0.76

0.70

0.78

0.84

Regionalization

0.93

0.90

0.79

0.90

0.92

0.88

0.78

0.71

0.81

0.86

0.85

0.74

0.70

0.78

0.84

  1. L1-fold-averaged Precision, Recall, F1 score, and Accuracy are displayed for all the analyzed cases and models. Best results are highlighted in bold