Table 3 Evaluation of the classification skills of our strategy against GPM, ERA5, its 2-km dynamical downscaled reanalysis VHR, and LR for the L1 region.
From: Accurate and efficient AI-assisted paradigm for adding granularity to ERA5 precipitation reanalysis
Metric | Task | 1 h | 12 h | 24 h | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | AI | GPM | ERA5 | VHR | LR | AI | GPM | ERA5 | VHR | LR | AI | GPM | ERA5 | VHR | LR |
Precision | Calibration | 0.64 | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 0.78 |
Regionalization | 0.64 | 0.42 | 0.30 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.77 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 0.77 | |
Recall | Calibration | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.81 | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.86 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.62 | 0.76 |
Regionalization | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.81 | 0.42 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.62 | 0.76 | |
F1 | Calibration | 0.63 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.78 |
Regionalization | 0.64 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.77 | |
Accuracy | Calibration | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.84 |
Regionalization | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.84 | |