Table 2 QTL for germination percentage at 10% PEG in the cv. Salinas × US96UC23 RIL population.

Model^a	QTL marker	Chromosome	Position^b	LR^c	LOD	R²	Effect^d	Favorable allele^e	Criterion^f
SMA	ANIM_0	4	197.6	16.22	3.53	8.6	7.14	cv. Salinas	1.03e−04
IM	ANIM_0	4	197.6	16.13	3.51	7.3	7.10	cv. Salinas	1.13e−04
CIM	ANIM_0	4	197.6	22.47	4.88	8.8	7.86	cv. Salinas	1.55e−04
	AXDH_0	8	129.4	21.30	4.63	8.3	7.66	US96UC23	1.55e−04
MIM	ANIM_0	4	197.6	16.11	3.50	7.3	7.12	cv. Salinas	BIC-M3
	ANIM_0	4	197.7	19.23	4.18	7.5	7.34	cv. Salinas	BIC-M2
	AXDH_0	8	129.5	13.53	2.94	5.7	6.10	US96UC23	BIC-M2

^aSMA (single marker analysis), IM (interval mapping), and CIM (composite interval mapping) were used as single QTL models. The MIM (multiple interval mapping) was used as a multiple QTL model.
^bGenetic map position (cM) in the cv. Salinas × US96UC23 RIL population.
^cLikelihood ratio (LR) was equal to 4.6 x LOD.
^dQTL effect was defined as one-half the mean of US96UC23 alleles minus one-half the means of cv. Salinas alleles as an average effect of allele substitution or breeding value/2.
^eFavorable allele was defined as the allele giving a higher germination percentage.
^fFDR-adjusted P-values and BIC were used for single and multiple QTL models.

Quick links

Search