Table 4 The solution results of the method comparison.
Gangue queue (gangue quantity) | Multi-task allocation strategy | CGSRS scheme evaluation method | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SR | TCSR | RUR | Time (s) | SR | TCSR | RUR | Time (s) | |
Example 1: 2764 | 0.9369 | 0.9396 | 0.7072 | 1025.35 | 0.9369 | 0.9396 | 0.7072 | 52.32 |
Example 2: 1942 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.5026 | 701.07 | 0.9990 | 0.9990 | 0.5013 | 37.14 |
Example 3: 2099 | 0.9989 | 0.9990 | 0.5428 | 758.61 | 0.9918 | 0.9943 | 0.5490 | 38.63 |
Example 4: 2334 | 0.9913 | 0.9927 | 0.6063 | 989.40 | 0.9906 | 0.9906 | 0.6078 | 42.52 |
Example 5: 2579 | 0.9646 | 0.9651 | 0.6754 | 1128.48 | 0.9388 | 0.9310 | 0.6860 | 55.64 |
Example 6: 2712 | 0.9401 | 0.9392 | 0.6978 | 1197.96 | 0.9076 | 0.9089 | 0.7016 | 58.06 |
Example 7: 2504 | 0.9049 | 0.9065 | 0.7258 | 981.09 | 0.8333 | 0.8327 | 0.7290 | 43.16 |
Example 8: 3153 | 0.8775 | 0.8814 | 0.7723 | 1155.46 | 0.8775 | 0.8814 | 0.7723 | 82.52 |
Example 9: 1886 | 0.9053 | 0.9019 | 0.7427 | 450.90 | 0.9053 | 0.9019 | 0.7427 | 27.15 |
Example 10: 1665 | 0.8690 | 0.8673 | 0.8095 | 387.14 | 0.8690 | 0.8673 | 0.8095 | 21.06 |