Table 5 The mean and standard deviation of satisfaction and importance, the difference of importance-satisfaction and significance test in Huichang County (N = 206).
Index | Importance | Satisfaction | I-P | T-value | P(2-tailed) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
Soil and water erosion(C1) | 4.311 | 0.474 | 4.049 | 0.416 | 0.262 | 6.185 | 0.000 |
Landform remodeling(C2) | 4.204 | 0.416 | 3.966 | 0.250 | 0.238 | 7.425 | 0.000 |
Soil improvement(C3) | 4.218 | 0.426 | 4.024 | 0.400 | 0.194 | 4.761 | 0.000 |
Slope protection(C4) | 3.966 | 0.250 | 3.961 | 0.440 | 0.005 | 0.137 | 0.891 |
Vegetation restoration(C5) | 4.374 | 0.495 | 4.039 | 0.472 | 0.335 | 9.556 | 0.000 |
Drainage facilities(C6) | 4.417 | 0.504 | 3.597 | 0.502 | 0.820 | 16.999 | 0.000 |
Geological disaster prevention(C7) | 4.461 | 0.509 | 3.995 | 0.288 | 0.466 | 11.189 | 0.000 |
Biodiversity (C8) | 3.956 | 0.205 | 3.981 | 0.197 | − 0.024 | − 1.214 | 0.226 |
Hydrological condition(C9) | 4.335 | 0.483 | 3.942 | 0.307 | 0.393 | 9.448 | 0.000 |
Air quality(C10) | 4.199 | 0.412 | 3.956 | 0.248 | 0.243 | 7.709 | 0.000 |
Land utilization rate(C11) | 4.641 | 0.491 | 4.092 | 0.337 | 0.549 | 14.674 | 0.000 |
Economic income(C12) | 4.684 | 0.476 | 3.291 | 0.534 | 1.393 | 24.447 | 0.000 |
Mine resource protection(C13) | 4.592 | 0.502 | 3.985 | 0.376 | 0.607 | 14.197 | 0.000 |
Travel improvement(C14) | 4.252 | 0.447 | 3.961 | 0.239 | 0.291 | 8.592 | 0.000 |
Satisfaction with the government(C15) | 4.660 | 0.485 | 4.044 | 0.360 | 0.617 | 15.285 | 0.000 |
Project implementation(C16) | 4.083 | 0.293 | 4.049 | 0.501 | 0.034 | 0.733 | 0.464 |
Resident participation(C17) | 4.461 | 0.509 | 3.374 | 0.542 | 1.087 | 20.534 | 0.000 |
Custodial condition(C18) | 3.927 | 0.260 | 3.990 | 0.407 | − 0.063 | -1.831 | 0.069 |
Sign and warning board(C19) | 3.825 | 0.381 | 3.976 | 0.303 | − 0.150 | -4.448 | 0.000 |
Landscape(C20) | 4.301 | 0.470 | 4.117 | 0.364 | 0.184 | 5.782 | 0.000 |
