Table 4 Statistical comparison of the results obtained by the developed TLC densitometric method and the reported methods for determination of ergotamine, phenobarbital, caffeine, dipyrone and meprobamate.
Proposed TLC method | Reported method | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERG | PHEN | CAF | DIP | MEP | ERG17b | PHEN24c | CAF17b | DIP24c | MEP38d | |
Accuracy | 10.20 | 100.53 | 100.06 | 100.07 | 98.90 | 100.55 | 99.29 | 100.07 | 100.66 | 100.00 |
SD | 0.876 | 0.709 | 0.920 | 1.414 | 0.566 | 0.962 | 1.514 | 1.053 | 0.577 | 0.995 |
Variance | 0.767 | 0.503 | 0.846 | 1.999 | 0.320s | 0.925 | 2.291 | 1.109 | 0.333 | 0.990 |
n | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
Student s t-test | 0.766 (2.160)a | 1.544 (2.262)a | 0.019 (2.179)a | 0.936 (2.306)a | 2.227 (2.228)a | |||||
F-test | 1.098 (4.210)a | 4.555 (4.760)a | 1.311 (4.280)a | 6.003 (19.330)a | 3.094 (4.530) a |