Table 3 Relationship between UHR and LFC.

From: Association between the ratio of serum uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and liver fat content: evidence from a Chinese health examination dataset

 

Crude model

 

Model I

 

Model II

 
 

β (95% CI)

P value

β (95% CI)

P value

β (95% CI)

P value

Male

      

UHR

0.175(0.150,0.199)

< 0.001

0.176(0.151,0.202)

< 0.001

0.090(0.057,0.123)

0.002

Q1

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

 

Q2

1.325(0.700,1.951)

< 0.001

1.324(0.697,1.951)

< 0.001

0.627(0.045,1.213)

0.034

Q3

2.217(1.592,2.842)

< 0.001

2.240(1.610,2.870)

< 0.001

0.971(0.337,1.579)

0.004

Q4

4.179(3.553,4.805)

< 0.001

4.216(3.578,4.854)

< 0.001

2.119(1.353,2.886)

< 0.001

P for trend

 

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

Female

      

UHR

0.270(0.233,0.308)

< 0.001

0.269(0.231,0.306)

< 0.001

0.093(0.043,0.143)

< 0.001

Q1

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

 

Q2

0.799(0.159,1.440)

0.015

0.800(0.160,1.440)

0.014

0.081(-0.527, 0.689)

0.794

Q3

1.916(1.277,2.555)

< 0.001

1.914(1.274,2.554)

< 0.001

0.210(-0.468, 0.887)

0.544

Q4

4.174(3.537,4.812)

< 0.001

4.153(3.513,4.792)

< 0.001

1.312 (0.499, 2.124)

0.002

P for trend

 

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

 

0.002

  1. Crude model: no covariates were adjusted.
  2. Model I: Age and nationality were adjusted.
  3. Model II: Age, nationality, BMI, SBP, DBP, TC, TG, LDL-C, TP, Hb, ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, FBG, and serum creatinine were adjusted.
Back to article page