Table 2 Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for all model configurations. Symbol ↑ indicates that higher values are better. The best values from each measurement are written in bold and and second-best values are underlined. As can be appreciated, in this evaluation, the PUNet-wSL models performed better in segmenting changing WMH (i.e., the combination of ‘Shrinking’ and ‘Growing’ WMH) than the original U-Net, which performed better on segmenting ‘Stable’ WMH. PUNet-wSL-vol had an overall better performance in estimating the future volume of WMH, as per Table 1.

From: Prediction of white matter hyperintensities evolution one-year post-stroke from a single-point brain MRI and stroke lesions information

Model’s name

Shrinking

Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) ↑

Stroke lesions

Growing

Stable

Average

Changing

UNet43

0.2228

0.2077

0.6609

0.3638

0.3644

UNet-vol

0.2239

0.2155

0.6485

0.3626

0.3649

UNet-wSL

0.2093

0.2026

0.6420

0.3513

0.3499

0.3588

UNet-wSL-vol

0.2125

0.2189

0.6452

0.3589

0.3579

0.3422

PUNet26

0.2132

0.2137

0.6385

0.3551

0.3633

PUNet-vol

0.2107

0.2232

0.6439

0.3593

0.3642

PUNet-wSL

0.2217

0.2130

0.6437

0.3595

0.3719

0.4499

PUNet-wSL-vol

0.2290

0.2112

0.6392

0.3598

0.3681

0.4281

Att-PUNet

0.2211

0.1796

0.6302

0.3437

0.3510

Att-PUNet-vol

0.2078

0.1981

0.6315

0.3458

0.3471

Att-PUNet-wSL

0.1968

0.2045

0.6240

0.3417

0.3543

0.5338

Att-PUNet-wSL-vol

0.1960

0.2077

0.6322

0.3453

0.3536

0.5430