Table 2 Linear regression model to show the 10-year ASCVD risk score (continuous as percent) in the metropolitan area versus the rural area after adjustment in different models.

From: Comparison of 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in metropolitan and rural areas of South of Iran

Model

Total

 

Men

 

Women

 
 

β (CI95%)

p-value

β (CI95%)

p-value

β (CI95%)

p-value

Model 0

1.07 (0.87, 1.28)

< 0.001

1.70 (1.36, 2.04)

< 0.001

0.55 (0.37, 0.74)

< 0.001

Model 1

0.81 (0.67, 0.95)

< 0.001

0.92 (0.68, 1.16)

< 0.001

0.55 (0.41, 0.68)

< 0.001

Model 2

1.03 (0.86, 1.21)

< 0.001

0.98 (0.68, 1.28)

< 0.001

0.90 (0.72, 1.08)

< 0.001

Model 3

0.77 (0.59, 0.95)

< 0.001

0.48 (0.18, 0.78)

0.002

0.80 (0.61, 0.98)

< 0.001

Model 4

0.87 (0.69, 1.05)

< 0.001

0.83 (0.53, 1.14)

< 0.001

0.78 (0.60, 0.97)

< 0.001

  1. Model 0: unadjusted.
  2. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex.
  3. Model 2: adjusted for marital status, occupational status, educational status + Model 1.
  4. Model 3: adjusted for body mass index, waist circumference, wrist circumference + Model 2.
  5. Model 4: adjusted for alcohol, opium consumption + Model 3.
  6. *The sex was excluded from models in the case of women and men analysis.
Back to article page