Table 2 Changes of dry matter distribution of sugar beet under different treatments.

From: Effects of continuous cropping and application of bio-organic fertilizer on photosynthetic performance, dry matter accumulation and distribution of sugar beet

Year	Treatment	Growth Stage
		Rapid growth stage of foliage			Root and sugar growth stage			Sugar accumulation stage
		Dry matter ration of above ground (%)	Dry matter ratio of root tuber (%)	Root shoot ratio	Dry matter ration of above ground (%)	Dry matter ratio of root tuber (%)	Root shoot ratio	Dry matter ration of above ground (%)	Dry matter ratio of root tuber (%)	Root shoot ratio
2020	CKN	64.02c	35.98a	0.56a	49.80e	50.20bc	1.01b	43.28e	56.72b	1.31b
	CKY	63.32c	36.68a	0.58a	48.17cd	51.83a	1.08a	41.92f	58.08a	1.39a
	C1N	64.49bc	35.51ab	0.55ab	50.54bc	49.46c	0.98cd	44.44cd	55.56cd	1.25cd
	C1Y	64.28bc	35.72ab	0.56a	48.87de	51.13ab	1.05b	43.36e	56.64b	1.31b
	C2N	64.45bc	35.55ab	0.55ab	50.85bc	49.15cd	0.97d	44.89bc	55.11de	1.23de
	C2Y	64.05c	35.95a	0.56ab	49.82cd	50.18bc	1.01bc	43.6de	56.4bc	1.29bc
	C3N	64.89bc	35.11ab	0.54ab	51.32bc	48.68cd	0.95de	44.64ab	55.36ef	1.24ef
	C3Y	64.46bc	35.54ab	0.55ab	52.19b	47.81d	0.92def	45.25abc	54.75def	1.21def
	C4N	66.55a	33.45c	0.50c	54.85a	45.15e	0.82f	45.30a	54.70f	1.21f
	C4Y	65.78ab	34.22bc	0.52bc	54.15a	45.85e	0.85ef	45.94a	54.06f	1.18f
Cropping Year	CK	63.67b	36.33a	0.57a	48.99d	51.01a	1.00a	42.60c	57.40a	1.35a
	C1	64.39b	35.61a	0.55a	49.71cd	50.29ab	0.93b	43.90b	56.10b	1.28b
	C2	64.25b	35.75a	0.56a	50.33c	49.67b	0.92b	44.24b	55.76b	1.26b
	C3	64.68b	35.32a	0.55a	51.75b	48.25c	0.87c	45.38a	54.62c	1.20c
	C4	66.16a	33.84b	0.52b	54.50a	45.50d	0.84c	45.99a	54.01c	1.17c
Fertilizer	Y	64.38a	35.62a	0.55a	50.64a	49.36a	0.93a	44.01a	55.99a	1.27a
Fertilizer	N	64.88a	35.12a	0.54a	51.47a	48.53a	0.90a	44.83a	55.17a	1.23a
Significance of factor	Cropping Year (C)	6.52**	6.52**	6.43**	36.84***	36.84***	35.83***	70.54***	70.54***	73.75***
	Fertilizer (F)	2.33NS	2.33NS	2.36NS	6.72*	6.72*	9.53**	33.89***	33.89***	37.42***
	C × F	0.10NS	0.10NS	0.10NS	2.07NS	2.07NS	2.81**	3.58*	3.58*	4.20*
2021	CKN	64.99de	35.01ab	0.54ab	47.77c	52.23b	1.09b	40.33e	59.67b	1.48b
	CKY	64.21e	35.79a	0.56a	46.46d	53.54a	1.15a	39.23f	60.77a	1.55a
	C1N	65.87cd	34.13bc	0.52bc	50.04b	49.96c	1.00c	43.27b	56.73e	1.31e
	C1Y	65.72cde	34.28abc	0.52abc	47.61c	52.39b	1.10b	42.16d	57.84c	1.37c
	C2N	67.12bc	32.88cd	0.49cd	50.17ab	49.83cd	0.99c	43.15bc	56.85de	1.32de
	C2Y	65.84cd	34.16bc	0.52bc	47.69c	52.31b	1.10b	42.27cd	57.73cd	1.37cd
	C3N	68.18ab	31.82de	0.47de	50.89a	49.11d	0.97d	43.99b	56.01e	1.27e
	C3Y	67.04bc	32.96cd	0.49cd	50.26ab	49.74cd	0.99d	43.66b	56.34e	1.29e
	C4N	69.10a	30.90e	0.45e	50.20ab	49.80cd	0.99d	46.75a	53.25f	1.14f
	C4Y	67.48b	32.52d	0.48de	50.22ab	49.78cd	0.99d	46.09a	53.91f	1.17f
Cropping Year	CK	64.61d	35.39a	0.55a	47.12c	52.88a	1.12a	39.78d	60.22a	1.51a
	C1	65.79cd	34.21ab	0.52b	48.82b	51.18b	1.07b	42.72c	57.29b	1.34b
	C2	66.49bc	33.52bc	0.50bc	48.93b	51.07b	1.07b	42.71c	57.29b	1.34b
	C3	67.61ab	32.39cd	0.48cd	50.58a	49.79c	1.00c	43.82b	56.18c	1.28c
	C4	68.29a	31.71d	0.46d	50.21a	49.42c	0.99c	46.42a	53.58d	1.16d
Fertilizer	Y	66.06a	33.94a	0.51a	48.45b	51.55a	1.07a	42.68a	57.32a	1.35a
Fertilizer	N	67.05a	32.95a	0.49a	49.81a	50.19b	1.03a	43.50a	56.50a	1.30a
Significance of factor	Cropping Year (C)	19.60***	19.60***	19.47***	64.80***	64.80***	71.68***	108.99***	108.99***	129.67***
	Fertilizer (F)	11.25**	11.25**	10.69**	81.14***	81.14***	28.67***	15.82***	15.82***	19.52***
	C × F	0.73NS	0.73NS	0.6NS	10.49***	10.49***	6.97**	0.51NS	0.51NS	0.8*

Numbers followed by different letters in each column indicate significantly differences at α = 0.05 based on ANOVA test.
The statistical significance is denoted by *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001, and NS, not significant.

Back to article page

Table 2 Changes of dry matter distribution of sugar beet under different treatments.

Search

Quick links