Table 6 The relative errors of estimated UCS based on derived equations for gneiss.

From: Influence of rock heterogeneity on the correlation between uniaxial compressive strength and Brazilian tensile strength

No.

Actual UCS (MPa)

Estimated UCS by Eq. (4)

Estimated UCS by Eq. (5)

Estimated UCS by Eq. (7)

Estimated UCS by Eq. (8)

Value (MPa)

RE (%)

MAPE

Value (MPa)

RE (%)

MAPE

Value (MPa)

RE (%)

MAPE

Value (MPa)

RE (%)

MAPE

A

71.20

81.75

14.83

18.52

91.43

28.42

23.42

101.70

42.85

26.44

B

126.67

97.57

− 22.97

109.12

− 13.86

121.38

− 4.18

C

126.68

112.36

− 11.31

125.66

− 0.81

139.78

10.34

D

100.80

103.12

2.30

115.32

14.40

128.28

27.26

E

43.39

52.58

21.20

58.81

35.55

65.42

50.78

F

73.25

101.47

38.54

113.48

54.93

126.24

72.35

G

99.07

 

108.50

9.52

10.72

85.92

− 13.28

95.57

− 3.53

H

59.53

64.69

8.68

51.23

− 13.94

56.99

− 4.27

I

79.58

71.07

− 10.69

56.28

− 29.28

62.61

− 21.33

J

106.13

100.37

− 5.42

79.48

− 25.11

88.42

− 16.69

K

70.31

55.41

− 21.19

43.88

− 37.60

48.81

− 30.58

L

82.38

89.64

8.81

70.98

− 13.84

78.96

− 4.15

M

106.08

     

102.98

− 2.92

N

99.89

     

36.03

− 63.93

O

96.93

   

87.65

− 9.57

P

121.30

   

43.95

− 63.76

Q

109.85

   

111.16

1.19

R

114.64

   

59.80

− 47.84

S

91.37

   

68.74

− 24.77