Table 1 Comparative analysis of AI-Enhanced offloading approaches in MEC systems.
Study | Methodology | Key metrics | Results | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|
AI-enhanced offloading combining machine learning for Industrial IoT | Latency, Task Success Rate | Reduced latency by 23% and increased task success rate by 15% | Scalability issues in diverse industrial setups | |
Pre-trained machine learning models for service offloading in IoV | Energy Consumption, Accuracy | Energy savings of 12%, 95% task accuracy | Focused only on IoV scenarios | |
Adaptive learning in IIoT environments for offloading | Energy Efficiency, Task Completion Time | Improved energy efficiency by 17% and reduced task time by 20% | Limited evaluation of real-world IIoT systems | |
Multi-stage learning with predictive analytics for IoT-based smart cities | Load Management, Energy Efficiency | Achieved 30% load optimization and an 18% improvement in energy management | Limited scope to IoT-specific energy optimization | |
Broad Learning for Task Offloading in Industrial IoT | Adaptability, Computational Efficiency | Improved adaptability by 25% and computational efficiency by 22% | Implementation challenges in broad IoT networks | |
Green edge AI leveraging adaptive sensing | Energy Efficiency, Computational Accuracy | Increased energy efficiency by 19% and achieved 90% accuracy in computation | Lack of empirical real-world testing | |
DRL-based collaborative networks for cloud-edge-terminal setups | Offloading Efficiency, Latency | 27% better offloading efficiency, 15% reduced latency | Relies heavily on DRL model training time | |
Proposed work | Hybrid AI architecture combining DRL, evolutionary algorithms, and federated learning for MEC | QoE, Energy Efficiency | Up to 35% improvement in QoE and a 40% reduction in energy consumption | Requires further real-world deployment validation |