Table 4 Fit indices for the three models.

From: The impact of instructional behaviors on learning motivation via subjective task value in high school students in Cambodia

Models

χ²

df

p value

χ²/df

(≤ 3)

CFI

(≥ 0.90)

TLI

(≥ 0.90)

RMSEA

(≤ 0.08).

SRMR

(< 0.08)

Measurement model

        

Second-order CFA model of the instructional behavior scale

188.377

77

< 0.001

2.446

0.943

0.922

0.053

(90% CI: 0.043 to 0.063)

0.045

Second-order CFA model of the learning motivation scale

163.742

96

< 0.001

1.706

0.964

0.955

0.037

(90% CI: 0.027 to 0.047)

0.039

SEM (effect of each aspect of instructional behaviors on the subscales of learning motivation)

Baseline Model

4637.291

465

< 0.001

9.973

 

Initial Model

(Based on the hypothesized framework and including non-significant paths)

951.075

419

< 0.001

2.270

0.872

0.858

0.050

(90% CI: 0.045 to 0.054)

0.054

Model 2

(after removing non-significant paths)

961.111

424

< 0.001

2.267

0.871

0.859

0.050

(90% CI: 0.045 to 0.054)

0.055

Final SEM model presented in this research (modify the model by allowing some of the error values to be related)

822.996

417

< 0.001

1.974

0.903

0.891

0.043 (90% CI: 0.039 to 0.048)

0.051