Table 2 The estimated differences in the incidence of UCC between the HRR and the PR (per 100,000).
Province | Urban | Rural | All | Age standardized incidence* | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRR | PR | Diff | Diff (%)‡ | HRR | PR | Diff | Diff (%) | HRR | PR | Diff | Diff (%) | Urban | Rural | All | |
Qinghai | 7.1 | 7.4 | 0.3 | 4.2 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 7.8 | 8 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 8.1 | 10.2 | 9.4 |
Xizang | 8.3 | 8.3 | 0 | 0 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 0.4 | 4.5 | 8.7 | 8.9 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 11.8 | 14.1 | 13.5 |
Guizhou | 10.8 | 10.6 | −0.2 | 1.9 | 9.8 | 9.8 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 14.1 | 11.4 | 12.1 |
Hebei | 9.6 | 9.6 | 0 | 0 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 0 | 0 | 9.4 | 9.5 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 11.2 | 9.3 | 9.9 |
Jiangsu | 8.6 | 8.7 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 8.4 | 8.5 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 9.3 | 7.3 | 8.2 |
Liaoning | 9.8 | 9.7 | −0.1 | 1.0 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 0 | 0 | 9.7 | 9.6 | −0.1 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 7.3 | 8.2 |
Ningxia | 9.4 | 9.4 | 0 | 0 | 9.3 | 9.2 | −0.1 | 1.1 | 9.4 | 9.3 | −0.1 | 1.1 | 11.7 | 10.6 | 11.1 |
Tianjin | 9.5 | 9.5 | 0 | 0 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 0 | 0 | 9.4 | 9.3 | −0.1 | 1.1 | 9.8 | 8.3 | 9.4 |
Xinjiang | 9 | 9.1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 0 | 0 | 9.2 | 9.1 | −0.1 | 1.1 | 10.2 | 12.1 | 11.3 |
Beijing | 10 | 9.7 | −0.3 | 3.0 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 0 | 0 | 9.7 | 9.5 | −0.2 | 2.1 | 10.4 | 8.5 | 9.9 |
Guangdong | 11.4 | 10.7 | −0.7 | 6.1 | 9.2 | 9.3 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 10.3 | 10.1 | −0.2 | 1.9 | 14.2 | 10.6 | 12.7 |
Shanghai | 9.3 | 9.2 | −0.1 | 1.1 | 9.9 | 9.4 | −0.5 | 5.1 | 9.7 | 9.3 | −0.4 | 4.1 | 9.4 | 8.7 | 9.3 |
Total | 9.1 | 9.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 8.9 | 8.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 9.3 |
