Table 5 Performance comparison on heart disease using various bio-inspired algorithms.
From: Bio inspired optimization techniques for disease detection in deep learning systems
Algorithm | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1 Score (%) | Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)6 | 90.0 | 87.0 | 88.0 | 87.0 | 92.3 | 91.0 |
Artificial Bee Colony (ABC)12 | 89.4 | 86.4 | 87.9 | 86.0 | 91.0 | 88.0 |
Cuckoo Search (CS)34 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 86.0 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 84.3 |
Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO)20 | 91.0 | 88.0 | 89.0 | 88.0 | 93.0 | 81.2 |
Dragonfly Algorithm (DA)49 | 87.0 | 84.0 | 85.0 | 84.0 | 89.0 | 86.3 |
Genetic Algorithms (GA)14 | 86.0 | 83.0 | 84.0 | 83.0 | 88.0 | 82.1 |
Ant Colony Optimization (ACO)60 | 87.0 | 84.0 | 85.0 | 84.0 | 89.1 | 86.3 |
Firefly Algorithm (FA)56 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 86.0 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 84.3 |
Bat Algorithm (BA)23 | 87.0 | 84.0 | 85.3 | 84.6 | 89.4 | 81.4 |
Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA)27 | 90.0 | 87.0 | 88.0 | 87.0 | 92.0 | 80.6 |
